Demo listing. This page uses illustrative seed metadata to demonstrate the Atlas. Claims shown here are not verified product facts.
Vendora
Enterprise Operations
Supplier onboarding and third-party risk review with questionnaires, document extraction, risk scoring and approval workflow.
Last verified 15 Sept 2026 · Updated 23 Sept 2026 · Metadata v1
Problem
Supplier risk reviews are manual, inconsistent across reviewers and slow procurement down, while approved suppliers are rarely re-assessed.
Outcome
Consistent, faster supplier decisions with a documented rationale and periodic re-assessment.
Who uses it
- Procurement Manager
- Risk Officer
- Compliance Officer
Key capabilities
Supplier intake
IncludedCapture supplier requests and business justification.
Domain:
intakeRisk questionnaires
IncludedTiered questionnaires by supplier criticality.
Domain:
questionnairesDocument extraction
AI-assistedIncludedExtract certifications, expiry dates and key clauses from supplier documents.
Domain:
documentsRisk scoring
IncludedConfigurable scoring model with reviewer overrides and rationale.
Domain:
scoringPeriodic re-assessment
ConfigurableSchedule re-reviews by tier and trigger on signals.
Typical workflow
Supplier risk review
Trigger: A business unit requests a new supplier
Task
Stage 1: Submit supplier request
Requester
Automated
Stage 2: Send tiered questionnaire
System
AI-assisted
Stage 3: Extract facts from documents
System
Automated
Stage 4: Score risk
System
Human checkpoint
Stage 5: Specialist reviews
Security reviewer
Decision
Stage 6: Approve or reject supplier
Procurement
Task Automated AI-assisted Human checkpoint Decision
About this foundation
Vendora runs third-party risk assessments from intake to approval. Questionnaires and supplier documents are captured once, key facts are extracted, and risk is scored against configurable criteria. Reviews are routed to procurement, security and compliance with a single decision record.
Continuous monitoring re-opens reviews when risk signals change.
Related applications
- • Addresses the same problem: Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Approval Workflow, Workflow Automation
- • Addresses the same problem: Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Document Intelligence, Approval Workflow, Workflow Automation
- • Addresses the same problem: Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Document Intelligence, Approval Workflow, Workflow Automation
- • Addresses the same problem: Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Document Intelligence, Workflow Automation
- • Addresses the same problem: Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Document Intelligence, Workflow Automation
- • Addresses the same problem: Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Document Intelligence, Workflow Automation
Supplier risk review
Trigger: A business unit requests a new supplier
Task
Stage 1: Submit supplier request
Requester
Automated
Stage 2: Send tiered questionnaire
System
AI-assisted
Stage 3: Extract facts from documents
System
Automated
Stage 4: Score risk
System
Human checkpoint
Stage 5: Specialist reviews
Security reviewer
Decision
Stage 6: Approve or reject supplier
Procurement
Actors
Requester, Procurement, Security reviewer, Compliance reviewer
Outputs
- Supplier decision record
- Risk score with rationale
Evidence generated
- Review trail
Exceptions
- Missing documents pause the review
Task Automated AI-assisted Human checkpoint Decision
Included ships in the foundation · Configurable is switched or tuned per customer · Extension is customer-specific build scope · Planned is on the roadmap and not available today.
Supplier intake
IncludedCapture supplier requests and business justification.
Domain:
intakeRisk questionnaires
IncludedTiered questionnaires by supplier criticality.
Domain:
questionnairesDocument extraction
AI-assistedIncludedExtract certifications, expiry dates and key clauses from supplier documents.
Domain:
documentsRisk scoring
IncludedConfigurable scoring model with reviewer overrides and rationale.
Domain:
scoringPeriodic re-assessment
ConfigurableSchedule re-reviews by tier and trigger on signals.
External risk-intelligence feeds
ExtensionAdverse media and financial-health feeds.
- Architecture class
- Domain-driven design, OpenAPI-first
- Bounded contexts
- 7
- API-first
- Yes — OpenAPI contracts are authoritative
- Identity
- Enterprise OIDC / SAML via the fazeZERO identity blueprint; tenant-aware role-based access.
- Multi-tenancy
- Tenant-aware
- Service boundaries
- 7 bounded contexts behind one API server.
- Integration approach
- Ports-and-adapters: every external system sits behind an adapter; OpenAPI contracts for inbound APIs.
- Eventing
- Integration events via transactional outbox.
- Storage abstraction
- Repository interfaces; DynamoDB or relational adapters.
- Deployment pattern
- Containerized API + web application; infrastructure as code per cloud profile.
- Architecture version
- 1.0
Approved domain names
- suppliers
- intake
- questionnaires
- documents
- scoring
- reviews
- identity
- Web Application
- API Server
- Application Services
- Domain / Generated Core
- Adapters
- Customer Systems
Generator source, templates and factory orchestration are proprietary and are not part of this listing.
Reference Adapter: shipped and tested · Previously Integrated: delivered before · Standard API Pattern: integrates via a documented pattern · Customer-Specific: built in your implementation.
ERP
| Integration | Status | Direction | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERP supplier master | Standard API Pattern | bidirectional | REST API |
Identity
| Integration | Status | Direction | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Entra ID | Reference Adapter | bidirectional | OIDC |
Communication
| Integration | Status | Direction | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Email and Teams notifications | Reference Adapter | outbound | Webhooks |
Deployment
- Deployment models
- Customer Cloud
- Cloud profiles
- Azure Profile, Cloud-Neutral
- Containerized
- Yes
- Regions
- GLOBAL
Cloud profiles describe approved deployment patterns. They are not formal marketplace certifications.
Data handling
- Stores customer data
- Yes
- Data leaves customer environment
- Configurable
- Uses external AI provider
- Configurable
- Sends logs externally
- No
- PII expected
- Determined during customer configuration
- Data-residency support
- Yes
- Subprocessors required
- Determined during customer configuration
Identity & access
- Authentication
- OIDC, Entra ID, SAML
- Authorization
- Role-Based, Tenant-Aware
- Source availability
- Proprietary
Support
- Implementation
- Delivered by fazeZERO or a certified partner during the Solution Definition and AI Production Sprints.
- Production support
- Production support available under a separate support agreement.
- Contact
- support@fazezero.com
Badges
Deployment-Ready Foundation
Application has passed the defined fazeZERO scaffold, build and testing baseline.
Customer-specific integration, security, configuration, hardening and acceptance remain part of implementation.
Issued 23 Sept 2026
fazeZERO Verified
Listing metadata and published technical claims have been reviewed by fazeZERO.
Issued 23 Sept 2026
Evidence shows that this listing represents real engineering. Internal metrics are only published when fazeZERO has approved them for publication.
Build
Automated tests
Deployment validation
- Last verification
- 15 Sept 2026
- Release
- 1.0.0
- Architecture version
- 1.0
- Listing metadata version
- 1
- Last published
- 23 Sept 2026