Demo listing. This page uses illustrative seed metadata to demonstrate the Atlas. Claims shown here are not verified product facts.
Regula Evidence
Financial Services
Automates regulatory evidence collection: maps obligations to controls, requests evidence from owners, reviews it and assembles submission packs.
Last verified 15 Sept 2026 · Updated 23 Sept 2026 · Metadata v2
Problem
Compliance teams chase evidence over email and spreadsheets before every regulatory review; artefacts are inconsistent and the trail of who reviewed what is incomplete.
Outcome
Evidence is requested, reviewed and packaged on a schedule, with a traceable link from obligation to control to artefact.
Who uses it
- Compliance Officer
- Risk Officer
Key capabilities
Obligation register
IncludedMaintain obligations and map them to controls and owners.
Domain:
obligationsEvidence requests
IncludedSchedule and track evidence requests with reminders and escalation.
Domain:
requestsEvidence review
IncludedFirst- and second-line review with comments and rework.
Domain:
reviewsAI evidence summarization
AI-assistedIncludedSummarize long artefacts and highlight gaps against the control description.
Submission packs
IncludedAssemble reviewed evidence into submission packs.
Domain:
packs
Typical workflow
Quarterly evidence cycle
Trigger: Scheduled review period opens
Automated
Stage 1: Open review period
System
Task
Stage 2: Request evidence from control owners
Compliance officer
Task
Stage 3: Upload artefacts
Control owner
AI-assisted
Stage 4: Summarize and flag gaps
System
Human checkpoint
Stage 5: Second-line review
Second-line reviewer
Automated
Stage 6: Assemble submission pack
System
Task Automated AI-assisted Human checkpoint Decision
About this foundation
Regula Evidence maps regulatory obligations to internal controls and control owners, schedules evidence requests, captures artefacts with metadata, and routes them through first- and second-line review. Submission packs are assembled from reviewed evidence with a complete audit trail.
AI assistance summarizes long artefacts and flags evidence that does not appear to satisfy the control description.
Related applications
- • Addresses the same problem: Regulatory Reporting Burden, Weak Evidence
- • Shared capabilities: Evidence Management, Reporting
- • Addresses the same problem: Weak Evidence, Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Evidence Management, Workflow Automation, Approval Workflow
- • Addresses the same problem: Weak Evidence, Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Workflow Automation, Summarization
- • Addresses the same problem: Weak Evidence, Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Workflow Automation, Approval Workflow, Reporting
- • Addresses the same problem: Weak Evidence, Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Approval Workflow
- • Addresses the same problem: Manual Workflow
- • Shared capabilities: Workflow Automation, Approval Workflow
Quarterly evidence cycle
Trigger: Scheduled review period opens
Automated
Stage 1: Open review period
System
Task
Stage 2: Request evidence from control owners
Compliance officer
Task
Stage 3: Upload artefacts
Control owner
AI-assisted
Stage 4: Summarize and flag gaps
System
Human checkpoint
Stage 5: Second-line review
Second-line reviewer
Automated
Stage 6: Assemble submission pack
System
Actors
Compliance officer, Control owner, Second-line reviewer
Outputs
- Submission pack
- Open findings list
Evidence generated
- Review trail per control
Exceptions
- Overdue evidence escalates to control owner manager
Task Automated AI-assisted Human checkpoint Decision
Included ships in the foundation · Configurable is switched or tuned per customer · Extension is customer-specific build scope · Planned is on the roadmap and not available today.
Obligation register
IncludedMaintain obligations and map them to controls and owners.
Domain:
obligationsEvidence requests
IncludedSchedule and track evidence requests with reminders and escalation.
Domain:
requestsEvidence review
IncludedFirst- and second-line review with comments and rework.
Domain:
reviewsAI evidence summarization
AI-assistedIncludedSummarize long artefacts and highlight gaps against the control description.
Submission packs
IncludedAssemble reviewed evidence into submission packs.
Domain:
packsRegulator portal submission
ExtensionDirect submission to a regulator portal.
- Architecture class
- Domain-driven design, OpenAPI-first
- Bounded contexts
- 7
- API-first
- Yes — OpenAPI contracts are authoritative
- Identity
- Enterprise OIDC / SAML via the fazeZERO identity blueprint; tenant-aware role-based access.
- Multi-tenancy
- Tenant-aware
- Service boundaries
- 7 bounded contexts behind one API server.
- Integration approach
- Ports-and-adapters: every external system sits behind an adapter; OpenAPI contracts for inbound APIs.
- Eventing
- Integration events via transactional outbox.
- Storage abstraction
- Repository interfaces; DynamoDB or relational adapters.
- Deployment pattern
- Containerized API + web application; infrastructure as code per cloud profile.
- Architecture version
- 1.0
Approved domain names
- obligations
- controls
- requests
- artefacts
- reviews
- packs
- identity
- Web Application
- API Server
- Application Services
- Domain / Generated Core
- Adapters
- Customer Systems
Generator source, templates and factory orchestration are proprietary and are not part of this listing.
Reference Adapter: shipped and tested · Previously Integrated: delivered before · Standard API Pattern: integrates via a documented pattern · Customer-Specific: built in your implementation.
Identity
| Integration | Status | Direction | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Entra ID | Reference Adapter | bidirectional | OIDC |
Document Management
| Integration | Status | Direction | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| SharePoint / document management | Standard API Pattern | bidirectional | REST API |
Compliance
| Integration | Status | Direction | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Customer-Specific | bidirectional | REST API |
Communication
| Integration | Status | Direction | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Email notifications | Reference Adapter | outbound | SMTP |
Deployment
- Deployment models
- Customer Cloud, Private Cloud
- Cloud profiles
- Azure Profile, AWS Profile, Cloud-Neutral
- Containerized
- Yes
- Regions
- GCC, UAE, SAUDI ARABIA
Cloud profiles describe approved deployment patterns. They are not formal marketplace certifications.
Data handling
- Stores customer data
- Yes
- Data leaves customer environment
- Configurable
- Uses external AI provider
- Configurable
- Sends logs externally
- No
- PII expected
- Determined during customer configuration
- Data-residency support
- Yes
- Subprocessors required
- Determined during customer configuration
Identity & access
- Authentication
- OIDC, Entra ID, SAML
- Authorization
- Role-Based, Tenant-Aware
- Source availability
- Proprietary
Support
- Implementation
- Delivered by fazeZERO or a certified partner during the Solution Definition and AI Production Sprints.
- Production support
- Production support available under a separate support agreement.
- Contact
- support@fazezero.com
Badges
Deployment-Ready Foundation
Application has passed the defined fazeZERO scaffold, build and testing baseline.
Customer-specific integration, security, configuration, hardening and acceptance remain part of implementation.
Issued 23 Sept 2026
fazeZERO Verified
Listing metadata and published technical claims have been reviewed by fazeZERO.
Issued 23 Sept 2026
Evidence shows that this listing represents real engineering. Internal metrics are only published when fazeZERO has approved them for publication.
Build
Automated tests
Deployment validation
- Last verification
- 15 Sept 2026
- Release
- 1.0.0
- Architecture version
- 1.0
- Listing metadata version
- 2
- Last published
- 23 Sept 2026